"I know if I lie and say it was for me it would be a lot lesser offence. But I won't lie, I don't see why I should lie for something I believe in. "My intention was if anyone asked for it to relieve their suffering, if someone had turned up with a medicinal need ... and they asked me for help, I would have gone to the car and given it to them." As the trial opened yesterday, Karl Scholz, prosecuting, told the jury: "There is no dispute that the items found in his car were his. | 
